I ain't mean; I am realistic which makes me ultimately nice and others ultimately cruel.

I ain't mean; I am realistic which makes me ultimately nice and others ultimately cruel. So let’s say I give out guns 50 hours a week in 50 states 50 week a year for 50 years: You are still more likely to become homeless yourself then to get shot. Unless, of course, you are an ex-president, ex-Beatle, or OJ Simpson’s ex. In the later case, I don’t see why when a messed up, good for nothing and gold-digging honky who plays with fire and gets burned by a has-been who never really was and will never be, becomes front page of the New York Times. I suppose 600 years from now we might live in a utopian world were 15,000 other people don't get killed that year therefor making that idividual case real news. But anyway, I digress, I guess from the point I am trying to make. And the people getting shot by homeless people would have gotten shot anyway; remember those snipers a few years back? Even so, if a few people get shot in the process of ending hundreds of years of homelessness in America, I am actually sad. Sad like I am about Germans getting killed in process of winning, or at least losing less, in World War II. In an often evil world, [not choosing] the much lesser of two evils is ultimately cruel.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/24/national/main526798.shtml