Crack is to junkies what guns are to N C

My pal, N C, has quite an arsenal of firearms. He must know what smoking crack is like because it seems he gets that feeling whenever he fires a new WLD. (Weapon of Local Destruction) He even supports Bush going to Iraq to take away bad guy Sadam Husan's WLDs while bad guy Kim Jong Ill in North Korea actually has WMDs (Weapon of Mass Destruction.) It must take a lot of gun love to go after WLDs instead of WMDs. Anyway, we have been friends for many years. So when he told me that he bought a few more rifles, he knew what I was going to say next: let's give a few of your old ones to homeless people? He stated that if he did that, it would increase the likelihood that a bad cop would likely shoot the armed homeless person dead. I felt dumb because I hadn't thought of that before. But perhaps I didn't think of that before because I am actually smart? What if he is wrong? I think the pigs would just mind their own bee's wax if they believed the best case scenario would be a mountain of "I shot a man" paper work. So what do you say to that, huh, not smart as me N C?

It has been over two years.

It has been over two years and I still haven't given out any guns to homeless people. I haven't even become a we yet. My wife doesn't even seem to be on board with this project. But then again, Karl Marx didn't become a household name until after his death.

Bum Fights

Young men do some interesting fads: bell bottoms, brake dancing, surf music, and others. I still like to see good brake dancing. A current fad is something called "bum hunting." This is where a small group of men go find a homeless person to beat up then beat him up. It is believed that one homeless person dies per month from this sort of evil. I wouldn't say this generation of young people are worse than others. Once apon a time is was considered cool by even more young men to beat up on blacks and gays. But these days, even a queer dude can hit a button on his camera phone and sooner that you can understand a Spanish speaking person asking for a hair product in the store you are in (you want to visit someone in gel?, oh, hair gel!), there will be 20 well dressed but somehow very unactractive women beating the hell out of the 3 or 4 gay bashers who feel like hurting good people will give them a good time. Even the Mormons would look at such broots with distain these days; let alone getting approval from the young lady that a young man would want to ask out to the prom. Beating up black people is even more taboo. But it is still safe to hate homeless people in our society. One thing that helps bring on the popularity of this crap are the "bum fights" videos which have sold over 300,000. I would like to see homeless people wip out guns and shoot a few of these hoodlems in order to reverse this fad.

What about homeless children?

Would I give guns to homeless children? No. Unfortunatly, there are homeless children to give them to. 40% of the homeless are families. I don't know what to give a homeless child besides a home. I can give them some kind of toy gun but it seems like they misplace it and loose it forever and get even more sad. In a nation that is supposedly more Christian than those heathens who allow gay marriage in Spain, shouldn't we take care of our all our children at least as well as the poorest children of Spain? But we don't. If you voted for Bush you are not a Christain because Christ wouldn't have wanted you to vote for someone who does nothing for homeless children.

http://www.nmha.org/homeless/childrenhomelessnessfacts.cfm

I ain't mean; I am realistic which makes me ultimately nice and others ultimately cruel.

I ain't mean; I am realistic which makes me ultimately nice and others ultimately cruel. So let’s say I give out guns 50 hours a week in 50 states 50 week a year for 50 years: You are still more likely to become homeless yourself then to get shot. Unless, of course, you are an ex-president, ex-Beatle, or OJ Simpson’s ex. In the later case, I don’t see why when a messed up, good for nothing and gold-digging honky plays with fire and gets burned by a has-been who never really was and will never be, becomes front page of the New York Times. I suppose 600 years from now we might live in a utopian world were 15,000 other people don't get killed that year therefor making that idividual case real news. But anyway, I digress, I guess from the point I am trying to make. And the people getting shot by homeless people would have gotten shot anyway; remember those snipers a few years back? Even so, if a few people get shot in the process of ending hundreds of years of homelessness in America, I am actually sad. Sad like I am about Germans getting killed in process of winning, or at least losing less, in World War II. In an often evil world, [not choosing] the much lesser of two evils is ultimately cruel.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/24/national/main526798.shtml

Homeless person's check list

I guess I am a list loving fool. To be honest, a gun is usually not the most useful thing to a homeless person. Here are a few things I think would be more important.

1. A nation that values it's citizens.

2. Cloths

3. A home

4. Medicine (if needed)

5. Drug treatment (if needed)

6. Mental health care (if needed)

7. A van

Rosa Parks and the homeless and the bus.

White supremacy is an ideological tool used to exploit others. One of the favorite weapons of white supremacy is the scapegoating of another group. It is more dangerous than the gun. The gun will remain in the kitchen drawer next to the forks while there is no motive to use it. Only way guns could become used is if one starts ingesting the gun powder residue one the forks which may give some just the type of brain damage essential to join a racial supremacy movement. Pretending that another group ought not have something and it needs to be taken from them becomes a motive to use a gun. At the founding of our country, these groups were the American Indians and the Blacks. We could think of our country as a great big bus moving us forward and occasionally backward. The engine of our country, since the beginning, is of human rights and exploiting others, human rights for those on the front of the bus and exploitation for those on the back of the bus. The homeless are on the back of the bus. Despite recent efforts of people like Rosa Parks, the legacy of exploiting others continues. Rosa Parks recently died. I like Rosa Parks. She refused to get onto the back of the bus and she was willing to use her gun if she had to. Thanks in part to her efforts, people's feelings toward Blacks has improved over the years. Scapegoating of Blacks has greatly weakened, yet the scapegoating in general has weakened to a mush lesser degree. The scapegoats of male white supremacy have moved on to new groups: Arabs, Muslims, Gays, poor people, and Hispanic immigrants. In an ironic twist, these days certain kinds of Black people join forces with, and are welcomed into, the community that was exclusively white and who carry a torch for exploitation faction of our founding fathers: Condusa Rice, Colen Powel, Janice Brown, etc... Perhaps some day, if we continue to practice the always blame somebody else game, and we become a country with a white minority, it will be the white man's turn to be the nigger. In a historic group sense, white people would be getting what is coming to them. But these future whites didn't cause the problems they will get in trouble for. It would be nice if we could once and for all establish that human rights is principle our country will live by as opposed to the principal of exploitation. I don't have a complete solution to this problem. Conservatives, as heirs to the legacy of white supremacy, do have a solution to this problem: pretend it doesn't exist.

Related link:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/race_relations/july-dec05/parks_10-25.html